In a stunning reversal, the U.S. Department of Justice has formally abandoned its long-running effort to uphold the high-profile convictions of two former South American soccer officials in its landmark FIFA corruption case. The move, signaling the end of a nearly decade-long legal saga, represents a significant retreat from one of the most ambitious international anti-corruption prosecutions in sports history.
The Foundation of the Case
The saga began in 2015 with a dramatic pre-dawn raid at a Zurich hotel, as U.S. authorities unveiled a sprawling racketeering indictment targeting FIFA, world soccer’s governing body. The investigation, nicknamed “Operation Captura del Balón” (Capture the Ball), alleged decades of systemic corruption, involving hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes for broadcasting and marketing rights to major tournaments.
Central to the case were the convictions of José Maria Marin, former president of Brazil’s soccer federation, and Juan Ángel Napout, former president of Paraguay’s soccer federation and of the South American confederation CONMEBOL. Both were found guilty in 2017 on multiple counts, including wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering, for accepting bribes in exchange for awarding lucrative media and sponsorship rights.
The Legal Unraveling
The path to this week’s decision began with the 2020 acquittal of a third official, Manuel Burga, and was accelerated by a pivotal 2022 Supreme Court ruling in Percoco v. United States. That decision narrowed the legal interpretation of “honest-services fraud,” a key statute used in the FIFA prosecutions. The Court’s reasoning cast doubt on whether the officials’ corrupt actions—while indisputably unethical—necessarily defrauded their employers under U.S. law, especially as they involved foreign entities.
In a cascading effect, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit overturned the convictions of Marin and Napout in 2023, citing the Percoco precedent. Prosecutors were left with a choice: appeal to the Supreme Court or concede.
This week, they chose the latter. The Justice Department filed a brief with the Supreme Court stating it would not seek a further review, effectively letting the appellate dismissals stand. While the defendants’ acquittals are now finalized, the DOJ noted that the rulings “do not cast doubt on the sufficiency of the evidence” of their guilt, merely on the applicability of the specific law.
A Mixed Legacy and a Warning
The decision closes a major chapter, but not the entire book. The wider FIFA investigation resulted in guilty pleas from over 20 officials and sports marketing executives. Many, like former CONCACAF president Jeffrey Webb, cooperated extensively. The case exposed a rotten core at the heart of international soccer, leading to seismic reforms within FIFA, including term limits, transparent bidding processes, and the controversial but transformative move of the World Cup to every two years.
However, the dropped bid reveals the limitations of using domestic laws to police global institutions. “This is a sobering moment for transnational anti-corruption efforts,” said legal analyst Cynthia Wright. “The U.S. overreach, while morally justified in the court of public opinion, faced inevitable legal boundaries. It underscores the need for robust international legal frameworks, not just one nation applying its statutes extraterritorially.”
FIFA, for its part, has claimed vindication in its own reformed governance. “The past is past,” a spokesperson stated. “FIFA is a fundamentally changed organization.”
The Final Whistle
For Marin, 91, and Napout, 65, the legal ordeal is over. They avoid years-long prison sentences and will likely return to their home countries. Yet, the world’s view of their actions remains unchanged by the legal technicalities.
The U.S. campaign against FIFA corruption will be remembered as a watershed moment that cleansed soccer’s top echelons. Its concluding legal stumble, however, serves as a critical precedent. It highlights the complex interplay between morality, law, and jurisdiction in a globalized world, and stands as a warning that the fight against corruption requires not just willpower, but precision-tailored legal instruments that can cross borders without breaking under judicial scrutiny.
The final whistle has blown on this historic prosecution, but the game of policing global sport corruption has entered a new, more complicated phase.
About The Author
